POOR MISS FINCH by Wilkie Collins

POOR MISS FINCH by Wilkie Collins

28 June 2010

Little Dorrit, Part Sixteen, II, chaps 19-22 (Mar. 1857)

Dear Serial Readers,

The part of this installment I found most interesting was Miss Wade's narrative addressed to Arthur. A note in the Penguin edition relays that Dickens' biographer John Forster dismissed this as THE WEAKEST chapter of the novel, and that Dickens "ruefully conceded." Besides the fact that I'd never consider voting for the worse chapter of a Dickens novel in the first place, I think that this "History of a Self Tormentor" does highlight the problem of the woman's voice in Dickens' novels. Some aspects of Miss Wade's story reminded me of Esther Summerson's (in BLEAK HOUSE) description of her ambiguous and shameful origins and her treatment by various guardians and masters and mistresses. And in some ways Miss Wade's narrative works as counterpart to Amy Dorrit's with her low birth in a debtors' prison. But unlike Amy who is selflessly devoted to her father, despite his abuse, disregard, and petty selfishness, Miss Wade has "an unhappy temper" as well as "the misfortune of not being a fool" (which fuels that temper).

Dickens seems to recognize plentiful causes of resentment and anger from his female characters, especially those oppressed by their class position as well as by gender, but his portrayals remain curiously ambivalent, at least to me. And maybe that's the reason Forster finds this such an unsuccessful chapter. Rather than "suffer and be still"--the motto of Victorian angels of true womanhood--Miss Wade and her other Dickensian sisters (Louisa Gradgrind, Edith Dombey, Alice Marwood, Hortense, to name only a few preceding this one) are vengeful and spiteful and proud. Yet there is something to be said for their insistence on their due, on equality rather than bondage (whether in employment or marriage), on treatment without condescension. Miss Wade's early recognition of Harriet aka Tattycoram as a Sister of the Bad Temperment might even imply a kind of fledgling feminist alliance, but Dickens does not bolster this alliance whatsoever. Instead, this "bad temper" of feeling and reacting to injustice (rather than the Amy Dorrit model of endurance) amounts to self torment only. Still, this measly chapter did make me reflect on the problem of women's voices throughout this novel (as well as in other Dickens novels)--from Flora's prolix ramblings to Mr F's Aunt's equally garbled, if telegraphically concise, articulations to Fanny's hot-cold, mercurial temper, to Affery's perplexing visions and Mrs Clennam's evasions. What did you make of this chapter? I was uncertain why Miss Wade would address her story to Arthur in the first place, except to set him straight about Gowan. Like Amy, Arthur is the recipient of many revelations, just as he is seeking some disclosure about Blandois and his mother.

As for the death of the Dorrit brothers, I can only account for this double death by thinking they were two parts of a whole--the proud, pompous, and self-centered William balanced by the attentive, sympathetic, kindly Frederick. I can only imagine too that their double deaths liberate Amy from her continued servitude (with her happy temper) to these men, as surely she would've remained devoted to her uncle if he had survived her father. Not to mention the added oppressions by a new stepmother in the form of Mrs. General. At least she's spared that disaster by her father's timely death! Now maybe she's free to shift her filial devotion to someone else, along the lines of the new father figure of Arthur Clennam.

I was also intrigued by more wandering and traveling out of England in this installment--Miss Wade as another wanderer who has traveled in Marseilles, London, Venice, Calais.

After next week (chaps 23-26 in part II), we have only two more installments, since the last (#19=20) is a double one. So get your MOONSTONE copy lined up soon!

Serially stirred up,
Susan

2 comments:

readerann said...

The discussion of Dickens’ women interests me, and I am intrigued and perplexed by the pages from Miss Wade. She’s been but a shadow the whole book. Why this sudden revelation on her part? She seems to have come by her bitter temper honestly, unanchored in childhood, as she was, and undistracted, or unabsorbed, as an adult. That she would care a wit for Tatty’s predicament is a wonder, even if she did see some of her own in it. I prefer Miss Wade, though, to modern versions of empty souls. Her edge stirs, provokes, intrigues. She has no shopping mall to busy through, trying to flee pain, or whatever the walled-up wounded do nowadays.

As for Amy, that’s it? She’s perfectly devoted to her selfish father, and then he dies? Now what? How WILL Dickens deal with her unfettered and now unfocused devotion? Simply turning it toward Arthur seems so predictable.

Kari said...

I found the chapter of Miss Wade's narrative disturbing--reminding me most of the Duke in "His Last Duchess." While it's true that the characters who are kind to Miss Wade often are out of pity, they still *are* kind, and she imagines hostility. What an interesting commentary on compassion as a response to poverty and inequity. Yet the tone seems entirely unsympathetic to Miss Wade--as I am by this time--and on the side of "compassion." I resented the chapter because the style of argument is one I so much more often hear from men about women: she made me yell! She made me throw that! And more dangerously. So, it bothers me to have a potentially intriguing critique of the primary mode of social care in Dicken's time and a potential expose of the weakness of such narrative styles be put in the voice of a potentially disenfranchised woman. I wanted to hear a tale of harm by Arthur's parents, but now I hope Miss Wade ends up miserable.

I guess I wouldn't vote on the worst chapter, but I wouldn't mind if this one were left out! I'm glad CD regretted it.

I was also struck by the death of the two brothers, and then the silence from Amy. That chapter had such an air of finality, I expected it to come at the end of an installment, but instead it was in the first chapter of the installment which then went on to other frameworks. That seemed rather in line with Dickens' structural choices, actually, and skillful.